Another Beachy Fairy Tale-Goldilocks and the Three Churches
Now it came to pass that there was a young worldly girl named Goldilocks. And Goldilocks did all those things which she ought not to have done, but she wore shekich clothes and yea, even pants, and did cut her hair, which thing she ought not have done.
(Now, I must needs digress from this story and deal with a pertinent topic at hand. For behold the rumor hath come to my ears that there are girls, indeed even Beachy girls who say within themselves that if the hair is under the covering that a little trimming is permissible, for verily, “I hath split ends (whatever those are), or I hath some other need which requireth the removal of my hair, which God hath said I ought not to cut, for I am not actually cutting, but rather trimming.” (Which is a pretty flimsy argument, since cutting and trimming are pretty much the same thing, and if you don’t believe me, just try “trimming” the first inch or so off your finger.) According to my calculations, there are only about three reasons for the removal of hair from a female’s head. 1) If it is growing on the chin. (This hair is given for the purpose of sex distinction, and belongs on men only; (in fact there are those who would say that this hair is MANDATORY for men, and that wearing it is one of the most BIBLICAL things you can do, but that’s a whole other subject) 2) If you are the victim of cancer, in which case you will not care about split ends, you will be glad you have ends to split; 3) If it is wrapped up in a PTO shaft or around a railroad track or some other such encumbrance which causes your life to be in jeopardy, and thus requires the speedy removal of your tresses.) But that is just a side note, and I may be misinformed, and for once, I hope I am wrong.
Nevertheless, Goldilocks, who did all these worldly things, decided that she wanted to go to church. Now in the forest in which she dwelt, there were three churches. Namely, the Charity Church, (which went by the name of Forest Christian Community Church) (for they never call themselves Charity churches, even when they are, because that would make them a denomination, and for some incomprehensible reason, that’s bad…) The second church was the Verdant Forest Running Creek Rocky Hill Conservative Mennonite Church, (for some reason, conservative Mennonite churches are always named after the local scenery, and the third church in the forest was the Forest Beachy Amish Mennonite Church, (which is exactly what it was)
And Goldilocks went into the Forest and looked about and behold! She saw the sign for the Verdant Forest Running Creek Rocky Hill Conservative Mennonite Church, and since she liked the name, she thought she’d give it a try.
And as she entered the church, she was met at the door by a stern looking man, who looked upon her worldly clothes with a narrowed eye. And he led her into the auditorium, where she took a seat in the back pew, where little children turned and stared at her, until their parents pinched them and made them watch the preacher (Which was kind of sad, because watching Goldilocks was a lot more interesting). And it seemed to her that the church was exceeding stiff and starchy; and when the service was over, she found that she had nothing in common with the women, for they spoke of gardens, and canning, and child-rearing, and other such subjects, and all that Goldilocks had knowledge of was make-up and jewelry and fads and TV shows and country music. And Goldilocks left the Verdant Forest Running Creek Rocky Hill Conservative Mennonite Church and she was not pleased, because it was too hard.
And she looked about and behold, she saw the Charity church, or rather, the Forest Christian Church (they seldom admit to being Charity) and she decided to attend that church next Sunday.
And behold, on the following Sunday, she found a seat in the back of the Charity Forest Christian Church. And they accepted her just the way she was, and they smiled at her and gushed over how glad they were to see her. And she attended the church for some time, until she discovered that although she was accepted the way she was, she didn’t really have a lot in common with those people either, and they didn’t do much to help her fit in. (There is a reason for that, but I’m not going to tell you what it is, because I will get a lot of angry comments if I do.) And she thought to herself, “This church is too soft.” And she decided to try the Forest Amish Mennonite Church, just to see if they’d be just right.
And on the following Sunday, Goldilocks walked into the Beachy church. And behold, all the Beachy’s were friendly to her and treated her kindly, (she didn’t have any children for the Beachy children to pick on) and she was pleased. And she found that the girls knew something of make-up, and a little about jewelry, and quite a bit about fads. The only TV shows they knew about were the ones that were old enough to appear on DVD, but hey, she liked the Dukes of Hazzard, and she was crazy about Bonanza, so that was fine. But what Goldilocks found out that what they really had a handle on was country music. For these Beachy’s could tell who sang “Long Black Train” and who sang “How Do You Like Me Now?” (And I bet almost every Beachy reading this post can too.) In fact, when one of the girls referred to the song regarding exactly what series of steps a young man must perform in order to procure a female companion in this municipality, she knew exactly what they were talking about. And she found that she could hang out with the young people without having to join the church, which was really cool.
And Goldilocks was sure that the Beachy church was “just right.”
chat wrote,
once again a very good tale. it really needs a sequal to be complete. you know, how did the end really turn out?
Link | June 23rd, 2008 at 3:03 pm
plain_jo wrote,
LOL Another great tale. Also right on bro on the 3 reasons for the removal of hair on a woman!
Link | June 23rd, 2008 at 10:48 pm
prodigal daughter wrote,
Just a note on the “trimming” of hair… once there is three inches of dead hair on the end of my tresses it is a total pain in the Beachy (or mennonite or gasp!, even charity) butt to comb those hair. Since you, Mr. HBB, probably have never had this problem let me explain how it works: These hair look like those “dyed one too many time” blondes. They are are all frazzled and frizzy. As soon as you are out of the shower these dead ends are dry because they cant hold any moisture. You run your hair brush through your lovely glorious hair and suddenly.. Aaaarrrgghhh, you hit the dead hair and it is “ruppich” and tangled. So then you become upset and disillusioned with the idea of not being able to cut your hair because it is to be your “glory”. Just wanted to let you know why some of us do these ‘awful, awful’ things.
Link | June 24th, 2008 at 5:11 pm
justanotherbeachygirl wrote,
preach it, sister!
i must confess i’ve never tried trimming the first inch or so off my finger, but alas! i have trimmed my fingerNAILS. and that, to keep them healthy and goodly to look upon. why then should we not take care of our hair, if it is still long?
Link | June 24th, 2008 at 10:52 pm
HBB wrote,
Oh, I’m sorry. I guess that must have slipped God’s mind when He said all that stuff about your hair being your glory and that you shouldn’t cut it.
Link | June 25th, 2008 at 11:27 am
justanotherbeachygirl wrote,
where did He say that? i’d like to see an article on it…
*rubs hands with delight and anticipation*
Link | June 25th, 2008 at 4:35 pm
prodigal daughter wrote,
Here is a very informative article about cutting women’s hair:
http://www.actseighteen.com/articles/uncuthair.htm
Link | June 25th, 2008 at 9:42 pm
Sven Svendsen wrote,
Oh yeah!? Well, this website also came up on the first page of google:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/2315903/Scriptural-Teaching-On-Hair
And it has a picture, too! She sure doesn’t have any problems with her hair apparently. Maybe if you stop cutting it, it’ll do it’s thing correctly.
Ah, and this:
“The words “have long hair” in these verse are translated from the Greek word komao, which means “to let the hair grow.” The word “hair” in verse 15 in the phrase “her hair is given her for a covering” is translated from the Greek kome, which refers to uncut hair.”
http://apostolic.net/site/staticpages/index.php?page=20071129180524149
How ya like them apples, eh? Thank you, google!
Link | June 25th, 2008 at 10:04 pm
Gina wrote,
QUOTE: “And she attended the church for some time, until she discovered that although she was accepted the way she was, she didn’t really have a lot in common with those people either, and they didn’t do much to help her fit in. (There is a reason for that, but I’m not going to tell you what it is, because I will get a lot of angry comments if I do.”
Hi, I am not Amish, but after doing some research to learn more about the Amish, I found your site. What exactly did you mean by the above quote? Why didn’t they want to help her or is this an inside joke?
Link | June 25th, 2008 at 10:30 pm
justanotherbeachygirl wrote,
to sven: my computer didn’t let me read the whole article ’cause it made most of the text into those annoying little boxes it uses when other programs don’t speak the right language. I was wondering, though, if i understood it correctly to say that the woman’s uncut hair is given “instead of” a covering/veil???! ’cause i’d totally disagree with that one.
btw, y’all, i really enjoy this site. if laughter is the best medicine then i’ve gotten really healthy during the past few days!
Keep up the humorous twist on our unique culture!
Link | June 25th, 2008 at 11:12 pm
Stoltz13 wrote,
Sven, I wouldn’t heap shame on a woman for trimming her long hair, would you?
I think it is ignoring context and taking liberties to claim that Paul’s words in Cor. 11 verse 6 are an order that a woman should never ever trim her hair. Note the word “if” used, doesn’t look like a command to me? Paul is making an observation.
Misuse of scripture like this is why I so loathe proof texting.
Link | June 25th, 2008 at 11:33 pm
prodigal daughter wrote,
Sven, I read the articles you linked to, so please read the one I linked to also. It talks about the Greek word kome, and explains it slightly different.
Anyway I don’t want to argue, but rather have a healthy discussion… My beloved husband is not sure what kind of discourse this is. But, oh to be like him, and never question and search the things our fathers have taught.
Link | June 26th, 2008 at 6:28 am
HBB wrote,
Admittedly, the arguments on this point tend to fall into two streams.
A- The head covering is necessary and thus, since the head is covered, hey, what does a little trimming hurt.
B- The head covering isn’t required because “the hair is the covering” and therefore if you cut the hair you are removing your covering and that’s bad, therefore, you can’t trim it at all.
All arguments that come forth fall under these two basic streams. I just don’t feel real great about heading down the slippery slope of hair trimming. BTW, I talked to my mother and she trims her split ends once in a while (gasp) so maybe the foundation whereon I stand is a little shaky. You really can’t have A and B at the same time.
Link | June 26th, 2008 at 11:44 am
justanotherbeachygirl wrote,
Chuckles. Thanks for the discussion, i was just curious what you were getting at in those parentheses.
Link | June 26th, 2008 at 6:49 pm
Sven Svendsen wrote,
Yes, I will admit I did not read much of the article you had linked to. But now this is the real honesty here: I didn’t read much of the articles I linked to. I also got lots of boxeso n that one article.
My post was more of a statement about using google or other internet articles to do our arguing for us when such a discussion can simply become a string of links.
Link | June 27th, 2008 at 8:13 am
Hans Mast wrote,
I hope you are being sarcastic about hair trimming, HBB. The Bible says that women shouldn’t cut their hair off (have their hair shorn). It doesn’t say that it shouldn’t be cut at all. It’s like the difference between cutting off your finger versus trimming your fingernails. Or like the difference between trimming your beard or cutting off your beard (shaving). (My second example is very Biblical, including the same sentence structure as Scripture.)
Furthermore, later in the passage, this concept is clarified even more:
This verse clarifies that the goal is long hair, not uncut hair.
Link | July 14th, 2008 at 4:30 am
Hans Mast wrote,
After I posted my comment, I read the article linked by prodigal daughter. It’s excellent!
Link | July 14th, 2008 at 4:32 am
aplaingirl wrote,
Thank you, Hans, for your common sense. I should like to see HBB try never cutting, shaving, or trimming any facial hair! Actually I should wish that HBB had had a little more common sense pounded into his head by that hammer, and had shut down this abominable blasphemous site!
Link | August 1st, 2008 at 6:19 pm
Hans Mast wrote,
Thanks for your affirmation, aplaingirl.
Don’t you think you’re being a bit hard on HBB? I am a faithful Beachy and see myself remaining such as long as I live near a Beachy church, but I see the weaknesses we have. I think humor is one of the best ways to deal with incongruities and inconsistencies. It introduces it to our consciousness in an inoffensive way. Plus it ensures that we don’t take ourselves too seriously.
I would be interested to hear from you which parts you think are blasphemous? That’s a rather serious charge to make that has a very specific Biblical definition. It’s a rather objective thing, whereas abominable is a rather subjective opinion. Since “blasphemous” is objective, I would like to hear you substantiate it.
Link | August 2nd, 2008 at 3:30 pm
aplaingirl wrote,
Blasphemous =”grossly irreverent toward what is held to be sacred.” Using the Word of God the way the word of God is used on this blog is sacrilege and blasphemy -unless of course, you do not believe that God’s Word is sacred and that using it in vain is equivalent to using His name in vain.
Link | August 3rd, 2008 at 7:36 pm
Hans Mast wrote,
Our English word blasphemy comes straight from the Greek βλασφημία (blasphēmia).
Strong’s Greek Lexicon:
I would ask you, where on this blog has God been vilified?
Easton’s Bible Dictionary:
When was evil spoken of God? When was God abused?
Smith’s Bible Dictionary:
Where in this blog is God spoken evil of? Where has God been abused?
Here’s an example of blasphemy in the Bible:
Does that sound like what this blog is? Blaspheming the name of God and cursing?
When somebody blasphemes, there is no need for anyone to make a case that that person blasphemed. It’s readily evident.
There are only two instances in the Bible (that I could find) of people accusing someone of committing blasphemy. The first was in 1 Kings 21:10 where Jezebel brought false witnesses against Naboth. The second were the Pharisees accusing Jesus and Stephen.
Link | August 5th, 2008 at 11:57 am
anothervoice wrote,
From Dictionary.com
Link | August 6th, 2008 at 10:53 am
aplaingirl wrote,
Hans, you said that blasphemy is defined as “vilification (especially against God): – blasphemy, evil speaking, railing..” anothervoice also included the dictionary definition, “impious utterance or action concerning God or sacred things.” You also quoted that blasphemy “according to its derivation… may mean any species of calumny and abuse.” I submit that this blog consistently abuses God’s Word. Does this blog uplift? Does it honor God? Does it treat God’s Word as sacred? No. Do you consider swearing using God’s name in vain as blasphemy? I do, and I consider using His Word in vain (as this blog does) equal to taking God’s name in vain. If you don’t define anything short of cursing God as blasphemy, then feel free to view this blog as non-blasphemous. I don’t feel that arguing the point any further will do any good. I leave you with one consideration… Imagine, if you can, being an unbeliever and stumbling upon this website. What would it do to your image of the Christian God, that a professed Christian could twist the Sacred Scriptures so lightly and make a joke of them?
Link | August 6th, 2008 at 8:36 pm
Marvin Mast wrote,
HBB,
I just discovered your website this past Sunday at lunchtime as I heard my 12 year old daughter talking about it. I’d be interested in knowing who you are and get to know you better. Just for the record, we are a Christian family of 7 that attend a Beachy church in Kansas and although there are some practices that we have that are cultural, I don’t think anyone has found the “perfect church” and we appreciate our fellow believers and share similar values.
I would simply ask whether you have considered whether using sarcastic humor is the best use of your writing talents? Have you considered what good might be accomplished if the time you spent here would be channeled in ways that would encourage and build up the body of Christ rather than tear down one particular branch of the church?
My mind was drawn to Philippians 4 verses 4 -9 and I quote it in the Message Version of God’s Word, The Bible.
4 -5 Celebrate God all day, every day. I mean, revel in him! Make it as clear as you can to all you meet that you’re on their side, working with them and not against them. Help them see that the Master is about to arrive. He could show up any minute!
6 -7 Don’t fret or worry. Instead of worrying, pray. Let petitions and praises shape your worries into prayers, letting God know your concerns. Before you know it, a sense of God’s wholeness, everything coming together for good, will come and settle you down. It’s wonderful what happens when Christ displaces worry at the center of your life.
8 -9 Summing it all up, friends, I’d say you’ll do best by filling your minds and meditating on things true, noble, reputable, authentic, compelling, gracious—the best, not the worst; the beautiful, not the ugly; things to praise, not things to curse. Put into practice what you learned from me, what you heard and saw and realized. Do that, and God, who makes everything work together, will work you into his most excellent harmonies.
I especially invite you to consider verses 8 – 9.
Sincerely,
A Brother in Christ
Marvin Mast
Link | August 8th, 2008 at 12:36 pm
Hans Mast wrote,
That’s simply not true. Show me one place (much less many) where God’s word is abused.
Definitely! My spirits have been uplifted many a times by this blog. Furthermore, because it puts these very important Biblical issues in the form of humor, it’s easier for us to see some of these problems in our lives. It’s a non-threatening way to get us to think. (Unless, we are insecure in who we are and easily threatened.) It’s uplifting for me because it causes me to think about what God would have me to do and how God would have me to live my life.
Yes, it does both of those. What it doesn’t treat as sacred is those who misuse God’s word.
Unfortunately, conservative Christendom has come to point that they reflexively think of stiff and starchy as being holy. It’s not. They think of political/Mennonite-al/religious correctness as being honorable to God. It’s not. The Pharisees were the stiff, starchy, politically correct ones that Jesus had very strong words for. Check out my graduation thesis from SMBI, Mennonites: the 21st century Jews, for more on this whole topic.
All you’re doing is proving the writer of this post’s point.
How does it take it in vain?
It makes valid hermeneutical points with the actual God’s Word.
It uses King James English in some of its writing. (Perhaps you are confusing King James English with the Holy Scriptures because that is the archaic and inaccurate translation we have used for so long?)
This is not a matter of definitions, though I have shown Biblically that this blog is not blasphemous as you originally charged. I have also shown that what this blog offends is not God or His Word, what it offends is your starchy outlook on life and your King James English.
Something I’ve found in dealing with unbelievers is that I often project my own starchy (and trust me, I’m plenty starchy myself; I’m just willing to laugh at my starchiness) worldview on them. But the truth is, they don’t have a starchy worldview. They often have a much more clear perspective of what is making fun of nonsensical practices of people and what is making fun of God.
Trust me, I’m a staunch Beachy and love my church a lot! I haven’t found a better one yet and I’ve been around. But we need to loosen up, be able to laugh at ourselves, not take this humor personally, and honestly ask: Why does this offend us? Is it because it’s offending God? Or is it because it’s making me uncomfortable about how I live my life?
Link | August 9th, 2008 at 6:44 am
Hans Mast wrote,
Ooops, I want to clarify one point: I do consider taking God’s name in vain to be blasphemy. Because of the quote/response structure above, it could be unclear.
Link | August 9th, 2008 at 6:47 am
aplaingirl wrote,
Just so you know Hans, I’m not Beachy, and I am currently laughing that you would think I of all people would be offended at someone poking fun at the traditions and starchiness of Beachys or Mennonites. In fact I upset a friend a week ago with a comment I made that was making fun of a “Mennonitism,” so to think that someone would think I was incapable of laughing at such foibles is actually rather hilarious. I still say that this blog does use God’s Word in vain. Please read http://www.beachycomplex.com/2008/05/apocryphal-beachy-psalter-psalm-152.html to see what I mean -I don’t care if this is KJV or ESV, the effect is the same -a making light of (using in vain) God’s Word. Read your dad’s post just above yours, and you will perhaps better understand what I am trying to say, but which you are either unwilling or incapable of seeing at this time. While you argue that this blog is uplifting your dad is saying, “Have you considered what good might be accomplished if the time you spent here would be channeled in ways that would encourage and build up the body of Christ rather than tear down one particular branch of the church?” (Marvin Mast)
Link | August 10th, 2008 at 6:50 pm
Hans Mast wrote,
You link to the clearly marked as “apocryphal” (i.e. not inspired) Psalm 152 to prove your point about blasphemy?? You could have hardly picked a worse post to point to. It is incredibly true and convicting! It’s absurd how little time I–we–spend with God, meditating on his word. That’s one of the best, most convicting, most uplifting, most encouraging posts on this whole site!
Dad and I have communicated via email and I understand and appreciate the wisdom of his stance (which is probably fairly distant from what you deem it).
Link | August 17th, 2008 at 8:28 am
L wrote,
I love i, BUT we do need to trim our split ends!If we don’t the split ends go further up the hair and then even more needs chopped.Guys simply do not think of this because they don’t have that problem.
Link | October 16th, 2008 at 10:16 am